I've done podcasts, interviews, articles, deep research and more on the topic of glyphosate toxicity and "detox," and I'll tell you the No. 1 most important and effective thing you can do to protect yourself in a world full of glyphosate is to grow broccoli sprouts and eat them frequently.

It's dirt cheap. Pennies a day. SERIOUSLY, you can just grow these for pennies a day in a mason jar, a cheesecloth covering, a rubber band, and by rinsing them with water 3 times a day. It's simple, affordable and HIGHLY effective. Look into "sulfate" and why glyphosate depletes your body of sulfate, and what broccoli sprouts actually contain: Sulforaphane, glucosinolates, etc.

AI answer on this: "Sulforaphane is a potent inducer of Phase II detoxification enzymes via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway, contributing to antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects. It has been studied for its potential in preventing cancer, supporting liver health, and managing conditions like autism and asthma.

True fact: Glyphosate was first developed as a DESCALING AGENT to eat away heavy metals from industrial pipes.

It was first synthesized by Swiss chemist Henri Martin in 1950 and was patented by Stauffer Chemical Company in 1964 as a chelating agent -- used to bind and remove mineral (calcium, magnesium, and other metal) deposits from industrial pipes and boilers.

This is why glyphosate strips so many important minerals (as well as sulfate) from your body, leaving you deficient and vulnerable.

You're being lied to about the FDA's artificial colors announcement. Some MAGA and MAHA people are claiming this new FDA announcement is solely about allowing "natural" colors to be used in products without having to label them as "artificial." But that's not what the announcement really says.

The announcement never actually defines what qualifies as a non-petroleum "alternative." It draws a single line -- petroleum-based vs. everything else -- and stops there. This is where the loophole opens.

Colorants like caramel color (which can contain the carcinogen 4-MEI), titanium dioxide (banned in the EU over DNA damage concerns), or other heavily processed mineral and chemical-derived colorants are not petroleum-based and could therefore allow product makers to justify a "no artificial colors" label.

The announcement also notably contains no enforcement mechanism. It's a letter of "enforcement discretion" for "voluntary labeling claims," meaning the FDA is simply choosing not to act against the mostly large corporations that will use the label this way.

There's no rulemaking, no formal standard, and no clear accountability if the labeling misleads consumers. The entire approach -- voluntary compliance on the dye phaseout, voluntary labeling standards -- puts the food industry in charge while allowing the FDA to engage in selective enforcement against small manufacturers while granting effective clemency to the large food producers.

No clarity, in other words. No standards. Just "discretion" from the FDA which has a long history of abusing its discretion to protect the profits of the pharmaceutical industry or the food giants.