The findings, published in the journal Climatic Change on Aug. 12, suggest that changing how people talk about food could impact dietary choices, especially in the context of "climate change."
The research team, composed of three professors and one doctoral student, conducted a survey of over 5,000 participants across the political spectrum, including Democrats, Republicans and independents. The study was driven by the hypothesis that red meat consumption significantly contributes to climate change and that linguistic adjustments could encourage people to opt for more "climate-friendly" foods. (Related: The United Nation’s climate change agenda is designed to starve and kill you off, not "save the planet.")
In the introduction, the study noted that "people’s attitudes can be influenced by … variations in terminology." It highlights that while terms like "climate change" and "global warming" are widely recognized, phrases such as "climate justice" and "climate emergency" are less familiar and more politically charged.
Interestingly, the study found that willingness to reduce red meat consumption correlated strongly with political affiliation.
Democrats were notably more open to cutting down on red meat, a food group rich in essential vitamins and proteins crucial for muscle growth, when presented with language stressing climate concerns. Conversely, Republicans showed little response to linguistic changes, indicating that shifts in terminology alone might not be enough to influence their dietary habits.
In turn, the study concludes with a call for more nuanced communication strategies. It suggests that simply altering terminology may not suffice and recommends incorporating everyday language, clear visual aids, social norms and default options that promote "climate-friendly choices."
WEF, Club of Rome and other globalists advocate reducing red meat consumption
In the past few years, globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Club of Rome have been spearheading the move to reduce red meat consumption while promoting plant-based and synthetic alternatives.
Bill Gates, alongside United States-based corporations like Tyson Foods, has invested billions in developing synthetic eggs, lab-grown chicken and other imitation foods, to combat the so-called "climate change."
However, these efforts have sparked a wave of resistance across Europe, particularly among farmers and food producers.
For instance, in December 2023, Italy's parliament passed a groundbreaking bill banning artificial food for public consumption. The legislation, supported by the lower and upper chambers, reflects a growing unease in Europe over the potential implications of lab-grown and genetically modified food on health, culture and traditional farming practices.
The Italian ban comes as the expansion of imitation meat and genetically modified crops triggers widespread concern among health experts, chefs and consumers worldwide. Critics argue that while organizations like the WEF promote these alternatives as solutions to climate change, they pose significant risks to public health and food sovereignty.
Meanwhile, opponents of the synthetic food movement accuse global elites of using these technologies to gain control over the food supply chain. Some assert that the ingredients used in these lab-grown products are not only unhealthy but also part of a larger scheme to ensure a dependent, sick population — ultimately benefiting Big Pharma and the medical industry.
The debate over synthetic food underscores a broader struggle between traditional agricultural practices and emerging technologies.
Visit Climate.news for more articles about the alleged effects of climate change.
Watch the video below to learn about the truth behind climate change.
This video is from the Deprogram your Mind channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
British gov’t accused of exploiting COVID-19 pandemic to push climate change agenda.
Reports claim that climate change gods are “displeased” as Ancient Mayan Temple collapses in Mexico.
UK government deliberately planning power grid BLACKOUTS to push climate hysteria.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
