UK regulatory agency touts vaccine safety, but warns people with allergies not to get the shots
The United Kingdom has already rolled out the inoculation phase of their coronavirus mRNA program. Now the UK’s lead regulator, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, (MHRA) is warning potential vaccine recipients NOT to take the shots if the person has a history of allergies or “powerful allergic overreactions” to vaccines. The warning was vague and did not detail the specific medical history or contraindications that would put potential vaccine recipients in danger. The report did not detail the type of allergies that would warrant a potential reaction to the shots. Any person with a history of anaphylactic reactions to vaccines, medicine or food are advised not to receive the shots. The first dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has already caused severe allergic reactions in at least three human recipients. All three individuals are currently recovering from anaphylactic reaction and associated health problems caused by the shots. Others will fall ill to Guillain Barre Syndrome, a typical vaccine reaction characterized by rapid-onset muscle weakness. If children are experimented on, some will experience Kawasaki's disease, which includes a variety of inflammatory reactions including fever, rash, swelling of the hands and feet, irritation and redness of the whites of the eyes, swollen lymph glands in the neck, and irritation and inflammation of the mouth, lips and throat. One of the more terrifying autoimmune diseases that could occur post vaccination is acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, a condition marked by sudden, widespread inflammation of the brain and spinal cord.
The MHRA, which approved the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine on December 2nd, warned that “a second dose should not be given to anyone who has experienced anaphylaxis following administration of the first dose of this vaccine,” yet the regulatory agency went on to proclaim that the shots have “met the MHRA’s robust standards of safety, quality, and effectiveness.” The government regulators tout that the vaccine has also been “critically assessed” by the Commission on Human Medicine and meets all “stringent standards for safety.”
Should people harm themselves just to feel safe in society?
If the inoculation was effective, then why are two shots required in one month’s time? Over time, will two shots be enough to satisfy the vaccine makers' experimental study design, or will more mRNA instructions be necessary to ensure that this simulation of "immunity" remains long term? With every additional shot, the risk of adverse events increases. This insufficient augmentation of immune response and increasing risk of adverse events was observed in the phase two clinical trials for the mRNA inoculations. How much cellular programming will be enough to please the minds of the fearful ones? How much mRNA instruction will be enough to please the demands of public health officials? How many hospitalizations and chronic conditions will be caused by this grand experiment? How many young minds will be coerced, brainwashed and abused into thinking they need to harm themselves in order to feel safe around people again?
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
