New Jersey parents and lawmakers slam mandatory flu jabs for students
10/13/2020 // Ramon Tomey // Views

A bill introduced in the New Jersey legislature last August requiring flu immunization for students before they can enroll in educational institutions drew flak from concerned parents and Republican lawmakers. The proposal lets officials “more promptly distinguish whether a COVID-19 or influenza outbreak is occurring” in schools, given that the symptoms of both diseases are similar.

However, the bill allows exemptions on medical conditions or religious grounds—but “a general philosophical or moral objection to the vaccination” did not qualify as a reason to opt-out. In protest of this proposed bill, hundreds of parents and children gathered Sept. 24 in front of the State House in Trenton.

“To mandate [vaccination] on all children for the public education that they’re constitutionally entitled to seem like a gross violation of our human rights and bodily sovereignty,” protest organizer Stephanie Locricchio said. The founder of the Wellness Warriors Revolution parental group added that giving lawmakers to decide children must get a flu shot is “overreach.”

“The government has no business making medical decisions for our bodies and our children,” protest co-organizer and New Jersey for Medical Freedom founder Ayla Wolf said. She added that the bill requiring flu shots would serve as a precedent to other mandatory vaccines.

Meanwhile, two Republican lawmakers in the State Assembly introduced Sept. 17 a bill forbidding government agencies and schools from requiring flu vaccinations for anyone 18 years old or younger. Assemblyman Gerry Scharfenberger, one of the bill’s authors, said his proposal only prevents the government from deciding on flu vaccinations—an issue parents should be deciding on.


According to the assemblyman, if the government is allowed to mandate vaccinations for seasonal flu, then nothing will stop it from mandating other vaccines—having the same idea as Wolf. He added that his “pro-personal choice” bill would stop the mandatory immunization proposal; if signed into law, Scharfenberger’s bill will supersede the one introduced in August.

Mandatory immunization infringes on constitutionally guaranteed freedoms in the name of public health

State Assemblyman Herb Conaway Jr. and State Sen. Joseph Vitale, both Democrats, were responsible for the mandatory immunization bill. The proposal introduced by Conaway and Vitale said mandating flu shots will reduce the number of hospitalizations and emergency room visits related to the flu, freeing up hospitals for patients with COVID-19 and other ailments.

The bill’s introduction comes alongside a predicted resurgence of coronavirus cases during the fall. According to Conaway, the bill is targeted to pass before Oct. 1, “so people can build immunity in their systems in advance of flu season.” The state already requires children to attend daycare and preschool to receive flu immunization.

School immunizations have been a contentious topic in N.J. even before the mandatory flu vaccination bill was introduced.

In January of this year, a bill repealing religious grounds for vaccine exemption did not pass due to a lack of support in the State Assembly. Parents in the state only need to write a letter mentioning that the proposed vaccination “interferes with the free exercise of the pupil’s religious rights” in order to be exempted from immunization. (Related: Religious vaccine exemptions explode more than 50 percent in New Jersey.)

A similar case of health freedom infringement in schools was also documented last August in Michigan. Oakland University administrators unveiled a plan to require its student population to wear a “bio-button” to track coronavirus symptoms. A school official touted the device’s ability to make contact tracing on campus easier. However, the plan did not materialize after the student body expressed its disagreement.

Most institutions have taken advantage of the coronavirus pandemic to put measures, such as mandatory vaccinations, that infringe on people’s health freedom.

Sources include: [PDF]

Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.