Mainstream media unleashes tsunami of fake news, yet none of them are removed from Google News for being fake
09/21/2019 // JD Heyes // Views

Conservative and Trump-supporting publishers know that they are constantly punished for their content by the Left-wing social media behemoths Facebook, Google, Twitter, YouTube, and others.

In fact, Twitter violates its own rules in order to ban conservative content while allowing Left-wing content to remain on its platform. And of course, several whistleblowers have come forth to explain how Google is altering its search algorithms and news feeds to downgrade any content that is to the right of Karl Marx and generally supportive of President Donald Trump.

But Left-wing “mainstream media” outlets, whose journalists are really Democrat Party operatives posing as reporters, can flat-out write and publish fake news about the president and his party and never so much as receive a fact-check from these same social media platforms.

As noted by Breitbart News’ John Nolte, in one recent week CNN, Politico, and The New York Times all published a bevy of fake news stories of the kind that normally would “end media careers,” that no longer happens in the age of Trump: Anything is acceptable if it is designed to trip him up and/or get rid of him.

Even lying, making up ‘sources,’ and publishing uncorroborated trash as real information.

In fact, “nowadays,” Nolte writes, “publishing fake news is nothing less than a resume enhancer.”

He writes that, earlier this week, both CNN and Politico published two “MASSIVE pieces of fake news.” But over the weekend, he writes, the Times essentially said, “Hold my beer,” and published a “bombshell” follow-up story of (stop us if you’ve heard this before) alleged sexual assault in college by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.


CNN got the fake news ball rolling with a report that President Trump so mishandled classified information that the CIA was forced to pull a key intelligence asset out of Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin. But of course, that’s BS — it never happened, we quickly discovered. “Whatever intelligence mishandling it was that forced the asset’s removal, it happened during the … Obama administration,” Nolte writes. 

According to Marc A. Thiessen: 

This leak exposed the fact that the CIA had a spy in Putin’s orbit who was passing on intelligence about the Russian president’s decision-making. Who leaked the information? Two senior Obama administration officials.

It’s no wonder there is no respect for journalists these days

The information leaked was that Putin himself ordered the 2016 election interference; the only persons who would know that are those close to the Russian president. So in order to try to hurt then-President-elect Trump, the Obama Deep State wound up compromising a valuable U.S. intelligence asset.

The CNN story by former Obama admin hack Jim Sciutto was so bad even the Washington Post and the Times cried foul. (Related: Limbaugh: ‘Impeachment for Trump will be different than it was for Clinton’ because of the fake news media.)

Next: Politico reported that the U.S. Air Force was rerouting plans through Scotland so its crews could stay at a Trump Hotel property there, with the implication that Trump was benefiting personally. Wrong. Come to find out, and in record time, the Air Force signed a contract to use an airbase near the Trump hotel as a refueling stop during the Obama regime. 

Neither CNN nor Politico have bothered to correct their fake news stories.

Finally, not to be outdone, the Times ran with a ‘new claim’ from a ‘witness’ that Kavanaugh, during a drunken frat party, forced his penis into the hand of a young lady — who would actually claim she had no recollection of the incident (as in, it didn’t happen). And the ‘witness’ who ‘saw it’ all? A former Clinton operative who has it in for Kavanaugh since the 1990s. 

Oh, and the Times blatantly omitted from the story the exonerating fact that the alleged victim said, ’nope, I don’t recall that.’

Did any of these fake news factories suffer loss of access to their followers and other repercussions from the social media giants? That would be a ‘no.’

Sources include:

Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.