Doctors slam the total health lunacy of Obama opening the border to contagious STDs

Sunday, March 06, 2016 by: Harold Shaw
Tags: immigration, STDs, infectious disease

---

(NaturalNews) The purpose of the Department of Health and Human Services is to protect American citizens from potential health threats. This goal has always been hard to achieve, since short-term immigrants and visitors have not been required to undergo any examinations that would help ascertain the condition of their overall health before entering the country. Virtually any person crossing the U.S. border for a short amount of time could be the carrier of a host of infectious diseases, and bring them into U.S. territory.

Then the situation got worse. When Barack Obama was elected, one of the first things he did when he took office was to remove HIV/AIDS from the list of diseases that could prevent an immigrant from being lawfully admitted to the U.S. That was the first of eight "communicable diseases of public health significance" to be struck from the list. Now, three others have been erased. As if temporary residents or visitors importing contagious illnesses wasn't enough, the U.S.A. can now receive permanent migrants suffering from chancroid, granuloma inguinale and lymphogranuloma venereum, all of which are sexually transmitted diseases associated with third-world countries. There are now only four syndromes left on the list of forbidden diseases.

Public safety or public exposure?

The 1993 health clause stipulated in the Immigration and Nationality Act was introduced for a reason. The administration saw an incredible influx of citizens coming to the U.S. from all over the world. Consequently, they thought that some basic measures to protect the population were necessary. It didn't seem like too much to ask for aliens to be healthy before they were allowed to cross the border. A little over 20 years later, something changed.

The only feasible reason for such an action coming from President Obama is the fear of losing the White House for another nine years to the Republican Party. As external threats keep accumulating against the U.S., citizens are more inclined to agree with the Republican policies of self-preservation and increased security. 21^st century technology doesn't make things any better. Now, enemies can invade federal or civil computer networks and even dispense biological weapons through unaware immigrants.

In light of the new change, more people will now be permitted to enter American territory and gain the right to vote. This political strategy appears to bet on the fact that these immigrants will, in exchange, support the Democratic Party in its future political endeavors. But the cost of allowing infectious diseases to cross the border is too high. We're not talking about something that stays in the body. These are viruses or bacteria that can spread. Quickly.

The cultural problem

Muslim fundamentalists, for instance, practice a form of "rape culture" when interacting with what they deem as "infidel" women. According to their sacred law, a woman who does not conform to the religious restrictions imposed upon her, or who has different religious convictions altogether, is an "infidel," and can be subjected to torture, rape and slavery. This type of culture promotes reckless sexual interaction and makes the further transmission of STDs much more likely.

What happens when these STD carriers that habitually objectify and sexually assault women are welcomed to a country where the majority of the population is not Muslim? The American population becomes much more vulnerable to an epidemic of STDs. This is why the director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Jane Orient, M.D., believes that the change set to take effect starting March 28, 2016 is a ticking time-bomb, riddled with "immigrants who follow an ideology in which the rape of infidel women is actually acceptable. And these migrants, when settled in places like Sweden, are causing an epidemic of rape, certainly of sexual molestation and assault on women, and so you have people who not only think rape is acceptable, but who have infectious diseases to boot."

At this point, for people not to be allowed into the United States they would have to have syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis or leprosy. What if we remove one of those from the list too? How many health risks is the American nation willing to tolerate?

Sources include:

NaturalNews.com

WND.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

JihadWatch.org