According to Law Enforcement Today (LET), the public health agency's purview "encompasses the study of factors contributing to injury and mortality, including incidents involving firearms." It added: "Over the years, the agency has commissioned research aimed at shedding light on various aspects of gun violence, seeking to inform prevention strategies and public health interventions."
But recent revelations have disclosed the CDC's deliberate deliberate suppression of data concerning defensive gun use (DGU), in turn raising concerns about transparency and the potential politicization of research. This suppression was brought to light through correspondence obtained by means of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, which uncovered a lobbying effort aimed at influencing the public health agency's messaging on DGU.
According to the correspondences, the CDC commissioned the National Academy of Medicine and the National Research Council for several studies on the matter. While the resulting papers acknowledged DGUs as a "common occurrence," the CDC notably opted to omit references to DGU statistics from its public materials. This move drew scrutiny after evidence of pressure from gun-control advocates to diminish or remove mentions of DGUs emerged.
Notable gun control advocates were involved in this effort to suppress the CDC. They were supported by introductions from the White House and from the office of Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL). Some of the advocates were as follows:
- Mark Bryant, co-founder of the Gun Violence Archive (GVA)
- Devin Hughes, founder and president of GVPedia
- Po Murray, founder and chairwoman of the Newtown Action Alliance
With Murray facilitating discussions, the gun control advocates engaged with top CDC officials to challenge the depiction of studies estimating DGUs, ranging from 60,000 to 2.5 million occurrences annually in the United States. (Related: State of Washington Democrats propose “overreaching” bill prohibiting self-defense weapons in public areas such as bus stops.)
CDC yields to censorship demands despite second thoughts on GDU numbers
Bryant, among the vocal attendees firmly criticized the 2.5 million figure. The GVA co-founder staunchly advocated for its removal.
"That statistic needs to be killed, buried, dug up, killed again and buried again," Bryant bluntly stated in an email to CDC officials following their meeting. "It is highly misleading, used out of context and holds zero value even as an outlier in honest discussions surrounding DGUs."
Despite its initial hesitation and an acknowledgement of varied estimates regarding DGUs, CDC officials ultimately agreed to remove references to DGUs from its publications. According to LET, the CDC's compliance with external pressure underscores the delicate balance between scientific inquiry and ideological influence. "By prioritizing political ideals over academic rigor, the agency risks compromising its reputation as an evidence-based research institution and eroding public trust in its findings," the police-owned media outlet reported.
Gary Kleck, a professor emeritus of criminology at Florida State University, denounced the CDC's decision to remove DGU figures from its publications. His research on DGU that spans decades has consistently demonstrated a minimum of 760,000 annual incidents.
"CDC is just aligning itself with the gun control advocacy groups," Kleck emphasized. "It's just saying, 'We are their tool, and we will do their bidding.' And that's not what a government agency should do."
Visit CDC.news for more stories about the U.S. public health agency.
Watch Dr. Judy Mikovits explaining why forming the CDC has been wrong all along.
This video is from The Real Dr. Judy channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
CDC recommends new COVID-19 boosters a day after FDA’s “emergency” use authorization.
Supreme Court to review challenge to Illinois’ semi-automatic gun ban.
French rioting demonstrates how gun control laws are failing law-abiding citizens.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
11 months ago
The perfect formula for the perfect storm. Remove all guns, de-fund police, have everyone check their hate at the door. Nice try but it will not work. Bad people do bad things to good people. Lawmakers don't deal with the bad people they just give them more power. The current people in charge want the wild west to return. And he who has the weapons makes the rules. Lawmakers are surrounded with armed security to protect them from good and bad people. Why? Good people want protection bad people want to steal from good people and kill them. Lawmakers don’t live in that our world, they cut themselves off from everyone because they are afraid of what they have created, and it scares them. One less politician in the world is a good thing they need to learn to work for living by the sweat of their brow.