Pfizer and the FDA also knew that people of all ages experienced temporary suppression of immune function for a week after the first dose.
But the most appalling of all is that Pfizer's documents show they have not ruled out the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement or ADE. Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is recorded as an "important potential risk" and as of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.
A total of 38 cases were deadly and 65 were uncertain. (Related: Pfizer, FDA have known for decades that antibody-dependent enhancement occurs in the vaccinated; tried to cover it up.)
With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents published last April 1, old suspicions have earned fresh support. The first bombshell revelation is that natural immunity really works and Pfizer has known it all along, according to "Rising" co-host Kim Iversen.
The clinical trial data revealed there was no difference in outcomes between those with previous COVID infection and those who got the shot. Neither group experienced severe infection. Natural immunity was also statistically similar to the shot in terms of the risk of infection.
The second revelation is that side effects from the vaccines were more severe in people aged 18 to 55 than those aged 55 and older. The risk of side effects also rose with additional doses, so the risk was greater after the second dose than the first.
The risk of severe COVID is significantly lower in younger people than those over 60 years old, which makes a high risk of side effects unacceptable.
"With a vaccine that is producing more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse events in younger individuals, the vaccine should have been restricted to those who were actually at risk of severe COVID-19," wrote The Naked Emperor on Substack,
Pfizer's documentation also includes medical information that mainstream media and fact checkers have called misinformation or disinformation. A pediatric consent form records several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in 100,000 which is far greater than the 1 in 50,000 rate earlier reported.
Myocarditis is far more common in young males, so for them the risk is substantially higher than 10 in 100,000.
The consent form also indicates that the effect on sperm, fetuses and nursing children are unknown. However health authorities and media have embraced as fact that the jab does not affect fertility or reproductive health and that it is safe for nursing and pregnant mothers.
By definition, if an effect is unknown you cannot claim it to be harmless. If you do, then you are plain and simple lying just like Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, who has frequently assured the public that the vaccine poses no health risks to pregnant women or their babies.
Likewise in August 2021, when Comirnaty was licensed, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed that the COVID vaccine was safe during pregnancy. Comirnaty is the market name of the Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also made conclusive statements about safety, saying that "vaccination may occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health." However even the Comirnaty label states that "available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine associated risks in pregnancy."
Follow VaccineDamage.news to know more about the injuries caused by Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.
Watch the video below to know more about the COVID-19 vaccine information that the FDA and Pfizer are trying to hide.
This video is from the Truth or Consequences channel on Brighteon.com.