Perhaps we should begin by reminding ourselves that the PCR test that supposedly detects "Covid 19" does no such thing. It chemically measures whether or not some proteins that may be related to some sort of virus, perhaps even that of the numerous Corona viruses, indicating by chemical change whether or not it determines some protein or another may exist in that fluid. It indicates nothing more than that, so if you have any corona virus like one of the many common colds or "flues", you have C19 according to those useless tests. They are so bad that Italy’s death rate for C19 dropped by 97 percent of the old numbers after a recount that included the idea. And even at that, the remaining cases are under suspicion and I believe it is much the same in our own nation, with the yearly influenza, pneumonia, car crashes, heart attacks, and more were blamed on the supposed C19 KNOWING that the PCR tests are fake and completely unrelated causes were reassigned to C19 as the cause of death.
(Article by Alan Barton republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)
With that understanding, let’s look at a chart published by Statista to see what some comparison numbers look like, posted below, as posted in a Health Impact News article that adds an arrow indicating the prime concern for us today.
That red arrow points to the 0-17 year old total deaths by C19 up to October 27th this year. Keep in mind the opening caution on the reliability of the C19 PCR tests. It is also very important to realize that Pfizer changed the formulation of its C19 vax for children to include a stabilizing agent for people suffering from a Heart Attack. What in the world for if it is so safe they are going to give it to children? Page 14 of an FDA briefing on "EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children" has the confirming text that shows Tromethamine (Tris) that is a blood acid reducer used to stabilize people with heart attacks with many known severe side effects.
Why add something to calm heart attacks in little children for a "vaccine" that is supposedly perfectly safe for those who have a next to zero chance of coming down with the disease they claim is Covid 19, when in fact, children are all but immune to it by their own numbers as shown in the above graph? What did they actually know from their very limited trials using children that they determined a need for such additives? All is NOT well in home town America folks, not at all; Myocarditus and Pericarditus in children is NOT a normal result of a "safe" vaccine. You should remember this graph we have posted a few times before concerning the C19 vax as compared to all previous vax deaths;
We have also read in many stories including here on ANP about the unreliability of the data on the VAERS reporting system as they catch about 1% of the total problems with the C19 vax as in the report in Vaccine Impact as far back as January 2020 where they quoted a 2011 report from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care for the HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services) when they said "Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of "problem" drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed." But we must work with what we have.
Add to this the analysis that recent VAERS analysis shows that "100% Of Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots Are From Only 5% Of The Manufacturer Lots According To VAERS" according to Sarah Westall when she reported that The Expose determined there were an unusually high number of Adverse Effects reported by the Lot Number of Pfizer and Moderna C19 shot batches. Their conclusion was that "This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.
The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11."
Even worse is the fact that The Expose reported that the MAJORITY of those bad batches that are responsible for most if not all of the deaths from the C19 vax were sent almost exclusively to RED STATES.
Read more at: AllNewsPipeline.com
Please contact us for more information.
