As you may recall, the former president pushed older pharmaceutical remedies like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at a time when the medical establishment as a whole wanted people to "mask up" and wait for a vaccine. Consequently, those remedies remain off limits to this very day, despite their extensive track record of safety and effectiveness.
"The hatred for Trump deranged these people so much that they're unwilling to objectively study it," Paul is quoted as saying. "They will not study ivermectin. They will not study hydroxychloroquine without the taint of their hatred for Donald Trump."
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which glowingly approved ivermectin for human use back in 1996, is now claiming in mockery that the drug is only for horses and cows.
"Seriously, y'all," the agency snarled on Twitter at people who choose to take ivermectin for the Chinese Virus. "Stop it."
If the FDA wants people to stop taking ivermectin, then why did the agency claim back in 1996 that the drug is safe and effective? Does the FDA have amnesia? Is it a schizophrenic organization? You decide.
Depriving patients in need of HCQ and ivermectin is genocide
According to Paul, the FDA is treating ivermectin the same way it treated HCQ, pretending as though it never approved these substances for human use. Suddenly, because Trump promoted them, the FDA is claiming that they are dangerous and not to be used.
Meanwhile, actual science shows that both ivermectin and HCQ, when used carefully under the supervision of a trained medical professional, can eradicate the Chinese Virus without the need for dangerous drug injections and a lifetime of mask-wearing.
An Ohio judge, it is important to note, recently ruled that a hospital must prescribe ivermectin to a Wuhan Flu patient who requested it but was denied by medical personnel who appear to be afflicted with "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
Perhaps this case will set off a chain reaction that results in medical facilities in other states likewise being forced to prescribe what a patient asks for, even if it is "politically incorrect" to do so because of Trump.
In the Ohio case, the patient's family doctor, Dr. Fred Wagshul, fully supports the lawsuit, arguing that the hospital in question is defying science by refusing evidence-based medicine to a patient in need.
"If we were a country looking at another country allowing those [Covid-19] deaths daily ... we would have been screaming, 'Genocide!'" Wagshul told the Ohio Capital Journal.
Wagshul also believes that the FDA is conspiring with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to deny patients of lifesaving Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) treatments in order to force them into taking deadly injections instead.
"I'm over 70 and proof positive that Ivermectin, whether it was the reason I recovered so quickly or not, does not do damage," wrote one commenter at Headline USA.
"I personally think any doctor who refuses to provide a prescription EARLY IN DIAGNOSIS, if that patient dies should be charged with malpractice. It would also be interesting to see how many doctors used HCQ or Ivermectin when THEY or their FAMILY got the virus. If they took it themselves and refused to give to patients, they should be charged with MURDER if even one patient dies."
Another commenter, aged 80, responded to this comment in agreement, noting that after "catching" the Chinese Virus back in December experienced "mild flu" symptoms and nothing more.
The latest news stories about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) tyranny and oppression can be found at Fascism.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.
