While many mainstream media outlets quickly ran with the story that Pfizer's existing mRNA injection for the Fauci Flu was given the official green light from the FDA, supposedly making it easier to mandate, others are saying that the FDA issued approval specifically to BioNTech, a German vaccine corporation, for a Chinese Virus injection that does not exist yet.
BioNTech, as you may recall, partnered with Pfizer to produce the current Fauci Flu shot that is being administered under an emergency use authorization (EUA). It turns out, however, that this is technically a different shot than the "Comirnaty" branded one referenced in the FDA's recent approval announcement.
It would seem as though there is a mass mind control con taking place right now in which the usual suspects are peddling a confusing, if not false, narrative that the current Pfizer injection has received "full approval" from the FDA. So, what is the actual truth?
According to Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of messenger RNA technology, the official FDA documents do not indicate, based on his own reading, that full approval for the Pfizer injection currently in use has arrived. That, he says, is coming around 2023 – be sure to watch the multi-part interview below to learn more:
https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430212200065556485
https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430224093526245379
So are the Pfizer jabs really "approved," or are they not?
In case you are unfamiliar with Dr. Malone, he recently blew the lid on the dangers of administering mRNA injections in the middle of a pandemic, fearing that he might be assassinated for coming forward with this information at a time when the government and media are aggressively pushing the shots as the final solution.
Now, Dr. Malone is taking issue with the government and media's latest claim that the Pfizer shot has been fully approved by the FDA when that may not actually be the case based on the wording of the approval.
On the flip side, Pfizer's own labeling suggests that its current jab authorized under EUA is the same as Comirnaty, and that the two are basically interchangeable.
"The FDA-approved COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the EUA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series," the Pfizer document states.
At this point, it is uncertain exactly what is going on, but we wanted to bring this conflicting information to your attention. By all appearances, it would seem as though the medical fascists are trying yet again to pull a fast one on the masses in order to justify "mandatory" vaccination schemes designed to enslave the world under Big Pharma rule.
An FDA release on August 23 further suggests that the agency considers Comirnaty and the current Pfizer injection being administered to be one and the same, and that the name is merely changing because the drug has received full approval.
"The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir'-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older," the agency says, seemingly supporting what the media is claiming about the approval.
"The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals."
As more news develops on this issue, we will keep you informed about the latest at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.
