Kansas City still requires masks, while St. Louis County reverses its mask mandate
08/03/2021 // Mary Villareal // Views

St. Louis County Council voted 5-2 to terminate its indoor mask mandate; however, Kansas City announced that it will still require people to wear masks in public indoor spaces where they cannot maintain social distancing.

Even as the county council voted to reverse the region's mask mandate, Kansas City mayor Quinton Lucas announced that he would still reinstate an indoor mask policy for restaurants and other public spaces.

The mandate, which came in tandem with the city of St. Louis, required all individuals over the age of five to wear a mask in indoor public places, regardless of their vaccination status. This order came despite death rates from COVID-19 being at their lowest since the beginning of the pandemic.

"We do have a mask mandate that is in effect in St. Louis County. It’s before a judge, the attorney general has filed a lawsuit and I hope that moves quickly to resolve this," he said.

In June, Missouri Governor Mike Parson enacted a law that limited the duration of local public health restrictions. It also barred governments from requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination in using public facilities and transportation.

While this law does not specifically mention masks, it does allow the governing body of any city to terminate public health orders issued to prevent the spread of COVID-19 at any time by a majority vote. (Related: St. Louis orders all vaccinated residents to return to mandatory masking while indoors, effectively admitting that vaccines don't work to stop the spread of COVID.)

Twin mandates illegal, says state attorney general

State Attorney General Eric Schmitt said before the council vote that claimed twin mandates from the county and city are illegal. Until the lawsuit is resolved, Page noted that the new health order would stay in place. This angered those who attended the council meeting.


“Sam Page and his supporters have done their best to make this discussion about masks versus no masks; they want to divide us,” Councilman Tim Fitch, Republican of the 3rd District, said. “Before we have that discussion, we have to settle his blatant violation of state law by issuing this so-called mask mandate.”

Councilwoman Lisa Clancy, a Democrat of the 5th District, on the other hand, voted against rescinding the order. She said that based on what she heard from legal experts, the council's vote has the intended effect of rescinding the public health order, but it may confuse people and businesses in St. Louis County.

Dr. Faisal Khan, director of the St. Louis County Department of Public Health, attended the meeting to answer council questions about the mandate, pleading to keep the mandate in place, based on the rising COVID-19 cases. He also said it was his duty to inform the council that the delta variant is "poised to cause more misery, more death, more disease, an increase in hospitalizations and inflict further damage on the population in the St. Louis region."

Councilwoman Shalonda Webb also said in a press release before the meeting that the "issue with the County Executive bypassing the St. Louis County Council and unilaterally making decisions for the people I represent with any official that doesn’t represent them."

By Wednesday afternoon, Schmitt was able to file a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in his lawsuit.

“On Monday, I filed suit to stop the unconstitutional, unreasonable mask mandates in St. Louis. Last night, the St. Louis County Council terminated that health order and mask mandate. Despite this, St. Louis County Executive Sam Page believes he can still enforce the mask mandate – he cannot," Schmitt said

"County Executive Page is wrong, and today we asked a court for an order to remind him of that fact."

Read more news and updates at Pandemic.news.

Sources include:





Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NaturalNews.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.