- Ty and Charlene Bollinger have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government and major tech corporations, alleging coordinated efforts to suppress alternative viewpoints.
- The lawsuit reveals a collaboration between government agencies, NGOs like CCDH, and tech companies to silence voices challenging official narratives, with specific mention of the "Disinformation Dozen" list.
- Webseed and Brighteon Media have also filed a lawsuit, accusing the government and tech companies of orchestrating a vast censorship operation, particularly on health-related issues like COVID-19.
- The plaintiffs argue that these actions constitute a direct attack on the First Amendment and free expression, aiming to preserve online discourse and the diversity of opinions necessary for informed decision-making.
- The lawsuits could set new standards for free speech in the digital age, preserving the internet as a true marketplace of ideas and challenging the "Censorship Industrial Complex" that seeks to control information flow.
In a groundbreaking lawsuit that has sent shockwaves through the media landscape, the Bollinger family has filed a comprehensive legal challenge against the U.S. government and major tech corporations. The plaintiffs allege a coordinated effort to suppress alternative viewpoints, highlighting the growing tensions between government power and the right to free expression.
The lawsuit, filed by Ty and Charlene Bollinger in the United States District Court in Nashville, Tennessee, reveals an intricate web of collusion between federal agencies and tech giants aimed at silencing voices that challenge official narratives. According to the complaint, the Bollingers were included in the "Disinformation Dozen," a list compiled by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a London-based NGO that has become a key tool in the government's censorship efforts. The plaintiffs claim that this designation was orchestrated by the government and used by platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Google to suppress the Bollingers' content, causing significant financial and reputational harm.
In a related lawsuit, Webseed and Brighteon Media have accused multiple U.S. government agencies and tech companies of orchestrating a vast censorship operation aimed at silencing voices that diverge from official narratives, particularly on issues like COVID-19. The plaintiffs argue that the government and tech companies conspired to develop and promote censorship tools, such as blacklists and so-called "nutrition labels," to suppress the speech of alternative media websites.
Jason Fyk, an advocate for digital freedom, underscores the deeply troubling nature of this collusion. "The government was entwined with NGOs and tech companies prior to this becoming public," he explained during an appearance on Wednesday, Dec. 18, on InfoWars' "The Alex Jones Show." Mike Adams of Webseed and Brighteon Media served as guest host for the program.
Both Fyk and Adams argue that the government and its allied entities are directly attempting to control the flow of knowledge. Adams emphasized the importance of decentralizing information, stating that independent media plays a crucial role in filling gaps in information, especially on health-related issues. Alternative news outlets, they argue, provide the missing information that is being deliberately omitted by mainstream media, allowing people to make informed decisions.
Fighting the censorship industrial complex and protecting free speech
The lawsuits filed by the Bollingers, Webseed and Brighteon Media are not just about reclaiming their own voices; they are about preserving the fundamental right to free speech in the digital age. The plaintiffs argue that the government's actions constitute a direct attack on the First Amendment and the foundation of free expression in America. (Related: Alternative media giants sue the censorship industrial complex.)
Charlene Bollinger summarized the case's broader significance: "This case is about much more than us; it's about the erosion of our most fundamental freedoms." She and her husband are fighting to expose the "Censorship Industrial Complex" and restore the rights of all Americans to speak freely.
The lawsuits highlight the broader implications of these actions for online discourse. By systematically suppressing alternative viewpoints, the government and its allies are effectively monopolizing public discourse, allowing powerful institutions to dictate the boundaries of acceptable speech. The plaintiffs assert that this process not only silences opposition but also deprives the public of the diversity of opinions necessary for informed decision-making.
As the cases progress, they promise to shed light on the complex interplay between government agencies, tech companies, and the tools used to control the flow of information in the digital age. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the future of free speech and the regulation of online content.
In an era where information is power, the legal challenges against the "Censorship Industrial Complex" serve as a rallying cry to preserve the exchange of ideas as a cornerstone of a free society. By fighting against government and corporate interests, the plaintiffs are not only advocating for their own rights but for the rights of all Americans to access and share diverse viewpoints without fear of suppression. The success of these cases could potentially set a new standard for freedom of speech in the digital age, ensuring that the internet remains a true marketplace of ideas rather than a platform controlled by government and corporate entities.
Check out Censorship.news for more stories like this.
Watch the first hour of the Health Ranger Mike Adams' guest hosting on "The Alex Jones Show," where he interviews Jeffrey Prather and Jason Fyk.
This video is from the Ron Gibson Channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Brighteon Media lawsuit against Big Tech and Big Government a fight for FREE SPEECH in America.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
