- Critics question the severity of the threat and the response, pointing to the low risk of human infection and the culling of over 100 million birds as disproportionate. Some suspect the outbreak is being used to justify increased government control over agriculture and food production.
- Government actions raise skepticism about true motives, including potential long-term regulation of dairy farms, increased surveillance, and focus on raw milk consumption, rather than addressing broader health risks.
In a move that has raised eyebrows among skeptics, Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a state of emergency in California following the detection of the H5N1 avian influenza virus in dairy cows. While the declaration is framed as a necessary response to an escalating threat, some are questioning whether this is yet another example of government overreach, leveraging public fear to consolidate power and control.
The H5N1 virus, traditionally associated with birds, has now been found in dairy cows, sparking alarm among officials who claim it could mutate into a more dangerous form. However, critics argue that the narrative surrounding the virus—particularly its leap to cows—may be exaggerated to justify increased government intervention in agriculture and food production.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to downplay the risk to the general public, insisting that the likelihood of human infection remains low. In the current outbreak, 60 human cases have supposedly been detected across the country, with 30 of those cases in California. Most of these infections have been linked to individuals working with infected poultry or cattle. Despite the low number of isolated cases, the detection of bird flu in cows has been seized upon as a justification for a more aggressive response, including the potential culling of dairy herds. This raises the question: Is the government using this outbreak as a pretext to exert greater control over the food supply?
The current outbreak has already resulted in the culling of over 100 million birds nationwide, a staggering figure that has left many wondering whether the response is proportionate to the actual threat. Now, with cows potentially in the crosshairs, concerns are growing that this could be part of a broader agenda to disrupt domestic food production under the guise of public health.
Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, has pointed out that the strain of H5N1 detected in Louisiana was not the "cattle strain" but rather a wild bird strain. This raises further skepticism about the narrative being pushed by officials, who seem intent on framing the virus as a direct threat to livestock and, by extension, human health. (Related: Avian bird flu suddenly becomes COW FLU as dairy farms begin culling animals to destroy the domestic food supply.)
Another deep state attack on the food supply
The declaration of a state of emergency by Governor Newsom is ostensibly aimed at providing resources and flexibility to combat the outbreak. However, critics see it as an opportunity for the state to implement measures that could have long-term implications for farmers and consumers alike. For instance, the emphasis on minimizing employee exposure on dairy farms could lead to increased regulation and surveillance, further eroding personal freedoms in the name of safety.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has attempted to reassure the public by stating that grocery-shelf beef and dairy products are safe to consume, but of course the agency advises against drinking raw milk. This distinction is telling, as it suggests that the government is more concerned with controlling the narrative than addressing genuine health risks. After all, if the virus is truly a threat, why the focus on raw milk consumption rather than broader safety measures?
Farmers have expressed reluctance to comply with testing and containment measures, a stance that health authorities claim could contribute to the spread of the virus. However, this resistance may stem from a growing distrust of government motives, particularly in light of past instances where public health crises have been used to justify draconian policies.
Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, has acknowledged that the current response has been reactive rather than proactive. This admission is telling, as it suggests that the government may be more focused on managing the public perception of the crisis than on addressing its root causes.
As the situation unfolds, it is crucial to remain vigilant and skeptical of the government's actions. The declaration of a state of emergency, the culling of livestock, and the emphasis on raw milk consumption all raise red flags about the true motives behind the response to the H5N1 outbreak. While public health is undoubtedly important, it should not come at the expense of individual liberty and autonomy. The question remains: Is this truly about protecting the public, or is it another chapter in the government's ongoing effort to control the narrative—and the people?
Visit Outbreak.news for more on the bird flu outbreak.
Watch this video reporting on Gov. Gavin Newsom's state of emergency declaration in response to the spread of bird flu.
This video is from the channel The Prisoner on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
More than 100,000 turkeys killed in Utah over bird flu scare.
USDA colluding with China to build bird flu BIOWEAPON with gain-of-function research.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
