On Monday, Dec. 9, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller defended Israel's invasion, stating that the Syrian army's abandonment of their positions in the buffer zone separating Syria proper from the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights – which the international community recognizes as Syrian territory – created a "vacuum" that could be filled by so-called "terrorist organizations."
Miller's statement followed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that it was conducting a "defensive action" against terrorists in Syria.
Critics point out that this isn't just about "defending" Israel. It's about a complex geopolitical web that includes Syrian rebels, Islamic State (ISIS) remnants and other non-state actors. By supporting Israel's actions, the U.S. risks getting dragged into yet another messy conflict in the region, they argue.
Moreover, Israel's incursion beyond the buffer zone and its bombing of over 100 sites inside Syria raises serious questions about international law and sovereignty. The idea that a country can cross into another's territory because its previous government has been deposed is a dangerous precedent.
The State Department's defense of Israel's actions also highlights a broader issue: The U.S. often prioritizes its relationships with certain allies over the stability and rights of other countries. In this case, the U.S. seems more concerned about protecting Israel's interests than fostering sustainable peace in the region. (Related: US hypocrisy reaches a new level: Israel's occupation of Syria is 'security,' Russia's moves in Ukraine are 'aggression.')
Now, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned, ISIS could take advantage of the current instability. Moreover, the U.S. is reportedly discussing the "merits" of removing the $10 million bounty on Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) leader Ahmed al-Sharaa. This group, which the U.S. has designated as a terrorist organization, has played a key role in the rebel offensive that ousted Bashar al-Assad.
The potential ramifications of removing the bounty are significant. It could signal a shift in U.S. policy towards HTS, a group that has links to al-Qaeda and was able to control a significant portion of Syria for years.
Meanwhile, Blinken has backed a post-Assad Syria, laying out a roadmap for a democratic and inclusive transition process that could finally end the decade-long conflict.
The U.S. will recognize and fully support a Syrian government that emerges from a transparent and inclusive transition process. This is a significant shift from the former President Barack Obama's administration's reluctance to commit to Assad's ouster fully.
But Blinken's statement also comes with strings attached. The future Syrian government must demonstrate respect for minority rights, allow humanitarian aid to flow freely, prevent terrorism and secure any chemical or biological weapons.
More news about the Middle East can be found at WWIII.news.
Watch the video below that talks about Israel's Syria incursion.
This video is from Cynthia's Pursuit of Truth channel on Brighteon.com.
Israel continues to unleash hell on Earth, with 250 new airstrikes across Syria.