Survey: Many Americans have limited knowledge of constitutional rights
09/17/2024 // Laura Harris // Views

A recent Annenberg Constitution Day Civics survey has revealed that Americans grasp the basic structure of the government, but their knowledge about constitutional rights, particularly the First Amendment, remains limited.

The survey, released ahead of Constitution Day on Sept. 17, reveals that 65 percent of Americans can correctly identify the three branches of the U.S. government: executive, legislative and judicial. This suggests a solid foundation in understanding the separation of powers.

However, while 74 percent could name freedom of speech as a First Amendment right, far fewer Americans recognize other key rights. Only 39 percent mention freedom of religion, 29 percent identify freedom of the press, 27 percent recall the right to assembly and just 11 percent know the right to petition the government. (Related: Former Biden advisor claims First Amendment is OUT OF CONTROL.)

Alarmingly, 22 percent incorrectly cite the right to bear arms, which is part of the Second Amendment.

The survey also examined public awareness about the U.S. Supreme Court and their opinions on potential reforms. Notably, 86 percent of respondents correctly know that justices are appointed rather than elected, while 85 percent correctly know that judges serve life terms. Additionally, 56 percent recognize that the Supreme Court, not the president, has the ultimate authority in determining the constitutionality of presidential actions.

In the court reform, public sentiment is clear: 82 percent of respondents support barring justices from ruling on cases where they have conflicts of interest; 77 percent favor implementing a formal ethics code for the justices; 69 percent endorse a mandatory retirement age; and 68 percent back the idea of term limits.

However, opinions on court reform vary widely by political affiliation. Both Democrats (87 percent) and Republicans (83 percent) agree on the need to disqualify justices with conflicts of interest from certain cases, but Democrats show stronger support for other reforms. For instance, 88 percent of Democrats support a formal ethics code, compared to 70 percent of Republicans.

The survey also revealed a connection between civics knowledge and attitudes toward court reform. Those with higher civics knowledge are more likely to back reforms, such as barring justices from cases with conflicts of interest, but are less inclined to support measures like allowing public votes to overturn controversial court rulings.

Experts weigh in on gaps in civics knowledge, push for Supreme Court reforms

In line with the results, R. Lance Holbert, director of the Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civicsstressed the importance of understanding fundamental rights.

"Civics education needs to be a life-long pursuit. The education materials provided through Annenberg Classroom and the Civics Renewal Network can aid in building up the nation’s civics knowledge reserves that produce a wide range of direct and indirect benefits," Holbert said.

Moreover, Matt Levendusky, a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, warned that if public trust in the court's independence continues to erode, it could result in reforms that undermine the power of the judiciary.

"The court's independence has long been sustained by its strong bipartisan support in the public. If that vanishes, the court may find itself reformed or constrained in ways that weaken its power," Levendusky said.

Visit FirstAmendment.news for similar stories.

Watch this video about the possibility of the TikTok ban bill being used to censor pro-free speech platforms like Rumble and Truth Social.

This video is from the Thrivetime Show channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

First Amendment victory: Schools may no longer police students’ social media posts.

Federal court orders California community college to stop censoring and violating students’ First Amendment rights.

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey: Protect the First Amendment by disallowing Big Tech-Big Government collusion.

Federal judge rules first-grader TOO YOUNG for protections guaranteed by the First Amendment.

California court rules children have no free speech rights – only old people covered by First Amendment?

Sources include:

StudyFinds.org

Brighteon.com



Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Copy
Embed article link:
Copy
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NaturalNews.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Close
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.