Back in 2015, the UN Sustainable Development Goals program announced that 2030 is the year when "zero hunger" will be achieved. Then 2020 arrived, bringing with it the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) "pandemic" and the UN's sudden switch to an engineered "covid famine."
On the one hand, the UN claims to want to help the people of the world get the food they need to thrive. On the other, the UN seems to be trying to depopulate the world with a "green famine" – so which is it?
For the industrialized world that survived the "pandemic," covid ushered in a seemingly easier life where fewer people had to drive somewhere to work, allowing more people than ever before to work at home. For the impoverished world, covid pushed hundreds of millions of the world's poorest people to the brink.
To address this disparity, the UN has come up with a plan to push so-called "sustainable diets" on everyone who is still alive. The claim is that sustainable diets are necessary to stop climate change, also known as global warming.
The UN has as one of its top priorities reducing greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide (CO2), which plants need in order to live and thrive. The goal is to bring greenhouse gas emissions back down to pre-industrial levels, which means a whole lot of people will have to die or disappear.
"Applied to agriculture, it will inevitably lead to a reduction of food diversity, production and accessibility," warns Rhoda Wilson, writing for The Exposé.
(Related: In 2022, the UN warned that a global food shortage "catastrophe" is currently unfolding.)
As many as 132 million people could die from UN sustainability goals
If the UN's food suppression efforts are a success, an additional 83 million people – or as many as 132 million people, depending on how you parse the data – could end up starving to death in order to make the planet more "green."
This upcoming September, the UN and its associated agencies will gather at the ominously named Summit of the Future event in New York. At this gathering, the world's top social engineers will discuss matters like global health, economic development, human rights and of course climate change.
The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), founded in 1945 as a special mission of the body to "achieve food security for all," spends $3.25 billion a year coming up with ideas like the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. This is when chemical agriculture on a large scale was ushered in as a solution for world hunger.
Behind the FAO are many of the usual suspects like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Environment Facility and the Green Climate Fund. The World Health Organization (WHO) is also involved in steering the FAO's agenda.
One of the FAO's central policies is the idea that everyone has a "right to food," which sounds nice until you realize that it is just a smokescreen for ushering in a climate-based food agenda that takes away people's ability to consume nutritious, healthy foods in favor of "plant-based," genetically engineered (GMO) and other Trojan Horse dietary formats.
"As the wording indicates, these guidelines are motivated by sustainability, defined as reducing CO2 emissions resulting from food production," one report warns about a "sustainably healthy diets" partnership that was forged between the FAO and the WHO.
"Meat, fat, dairy and fish are now the declared enemies and should be limited in daily consumption, with protein intake predominantly from plants and nuts, thereby promoting a quite unnatural diet compared to that for which our bodies evolved."
The powers that be are desperate to depopulate. Will they succeed? Find out more at Globalism.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.
