Redfield looks back now and calls the mandates "one of the greatest mistakes." These statements came during a session of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which focused on high-risk, gain-of-function research that has propped up a predatory and experimental vaccine industry.
Dr. Robert Redfield changes direction on COVID-19 vaccines and unlawful mandates
Redfield's latest remarks challenge the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety, highlighting concerns over adverse effects and the lack of transparency surrounding their risks. He expressed regret over the mandates, advocating instead for personal choice for all vaccination decisions. His change of heart contrasts sharply with the CDC, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccines as “safe and effective” during his tenure -- a fallacy that continues under the current CDC, headed by Mandy Cohen, a Biden appointee. Since Cohen took over the CDC, she has been pushing for annual covid shots, while upholding the fraudulent narrative that the jabs are safe and effective.
During the Senate hearing, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed Redfield on vaccine safety data, citing figures from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, (VAERS) documenting thousands of reported deaths after COVID-19 vaccination. Dr. Redfield acknowledged that the government health and regulatory agencies were not forthcoming about the millions of vaccine injury reports. He said the government agencies ignored vaccine injuries just to maintain vaccine uptake and public trust in science.
But this level of force and deception has nothing to do with science. It’s great to see a former CDC chief admit that, and point out that the government is wrong about vaccine mandates, which demanded obedience at the sake of one’s individual health and dignity.
Redfield knows that gain-of-function research is for exploiting populations with testing and vaccine programs
Further into the inquiry, Redfield called for a halt to gain-of-function research, describing it as a significant biosecurity threat. Gain-of-function research involves enhancing the transmissibility or virulence of pathogens. Redfield emphasized the need for rigorous oversight to prevent future pandemics which are designed to unleash predatory vaccine and testing programs. Gain-of-function is the unethical research field used to develop bioweapons, PCR and antigen testing programs and profitable vaccine platforms. Redfield knows all about this, and he needs to be more precise explaining the real planning that goes into these “pandemics” and how they are weaponized to exploit populations with testing programs and the false hope of deadly vaccine experiments.
The criticism of government policies extended beyond vaccine safety, and dealt directly with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) deceptive use of the data and their lack of transparency on all the issues that ultimate undermined the public’s trust in government institutions. While it may be too little, too late, Redfield called for the immediate release of all safety information to help restore public trust in health agencies.
Thankfully, Senators across party lines expressed support for increased oversight of high-risk gain-of-function research and biosecurity measures, echoing Redfield's calls for a dedicated agency to address emerging biological threats. The hearing concluded with calls for accountability and transparency to safeguard public health and national security in the face of future pandemics.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
