(Article by Susan Duclos republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)
That was a rhetorical question. Of course they would, and there are major indicators showing that is exactly what is happening.
We'll start with the liberal media because they're in the best position possible to gaslight and influence Americans. If they ignore something, a significant number of Americans will never see it, unless they are readers of Independent News Media as well. They direct the news, not as much as they used to thanks to the internet, but it does take a lot of work from independent websites collectively to force the MSM to address a topic they prefer the public remain ignorant of.
How can we tell if a MSM source is liberal or not?
We used to be able to look to donations to political candidates by journalists until many news outlets prohibited the practice, especially after the numbers were made public, proving liberal bias in the news.
According to Juliana Heerschap, Brat's communications director, the congressman was referring to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity (CPI), which examined donations by journalists to Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the presidential primaries and the first month of the 2016 general election campaign. CPI reported that more than 96 percent of those donations were made to Clinton.
Ballotpedia also reviewed three other analyses. The Center for Responsive Politics found that 65 percent of contributions from those identified as journalists went to Democrats in the 2010 election cycle. An analysis by MSNBC.com found that 87 percent of the 143 donors (who made contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign) gave to Democrats or liberal causes. The Media Research Center found that 94 percent of donors affiliated with five news outlets also contributed to Democrats between 2008 and 2016.
Americans are aware of the bias, with many even admitting their preferred sources have a bias, which is likely why they stick to those sources. Many Americans only want to see the news that fits their own thoughts and ideology.
This was confirmed by a former MSNBC producer, Ariana Pekary, resigned from the network and wrote a scathing letter as to her reasoning, where she called MSM news a "cancer," and explained how she was told point blank that "Our viewers don’t really consider us the news. They come to us for comfort."
Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Learn about our free, non-commercial AI / LLM project here. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.
While there are a variety of issues the media carries water for the Democrats on from abortion to Donald Trump, the economy is the focus of this piece.
MEDIA LIES ABOUT THE ECONOMY.....
According to the liberal MSM, "Bidenomics" is working beautifully, although many have stopped using the actual term, especially Democrats up for reelection.
There are a number of reasons for that. The number one reason is because Americans are still paying the biggest share of their income on food than they have for 30 years.
Joe Biden blames the media for not reporting "the right way" on the economy, which has got to be the saddest thing ever, since all the media does is protect Biden with their reporting. What the media cannot do is change the bills Americans see every time they leave the grocery store, or any retail store for that matter.
What the media can do is pretend that the chances of recession are over, while claiming that all signs show a recovering economy. In fact, one of the easiest ways to tell a leftists media outlet from one more to the center or even right-leaning is to look at the headlines.
Now, most know the Associated Press and NYT are far left liberal websites, but Business Insider is known to be only slightly left of the center, and yet the headlines couldn't be more different.
NYT reported America is "dodging" a recession on January 20, 2024, with Business Insider admitting there is still a very high chance of recession in 2024, on February 12, 2024, and the AP was published today, February 26, 2024.
One before and one after the BI piece say things are dandy, no recession, while the one in the middle of those two sites shows an 85% chance of recession in 2024.
A recession is likely to hit the US economy in 2024, a new economic model highlighted by the economist David Rosenberg suggests.
The economic indicator, which Rosenberg calls the "full model," suggests there's an 85% chance of a recession striking within the next 12 months.
That's the model's highest reading since the Great Financial Crisis in 2008.
Look at your grocery bills, your wallet and your savings, and you decide which site is more accurate, and whether the NYT and the AP are actively working to protect Biden from his own policies.
Read more at: AllNewsPipeline.com
Please contact us for more information.
