He began by reading the statute, which said: "During a public health emergency, [the] state health officer can order an individual to be examined, tested, treated, isolated or quarantined for communicable diseases [if] it has significant morbidity or mortality, and presents a severe danger to public health. Individuals who are unwilling or unable to be examined, tested or treated for reasons of health, religion or conscience may be subjected to isolation or quarantine."
"If the individual poses a danger to public health, the state health officer may subject the individual to isolation or quarantine. If there is no practical method to isolate or quarantine the individual, the state health officer may use any means necessary to treat the individual – 'any means necessary.'"
Renz explained that based on this law, a person can be quarantined if they pose a risk during a public health emergency. Moreover, the state health officer can also use any means necessary to force an individual to accept whatever treatment regardless of their faith or conscience. According to the health freedom activist, this egregiously unconstitutional law will remain so unless it is changed or challenged.
"Under this law – if there's a public health emergency, the state health official has this much authority," said Renz. "Now this sounds like health slavery, not health freedom to me."
Renz also mentioned that in a separate section under the same public health emergency law, all things related to the health emergency must be consistent with standards developed by the federal government. He pointed out that those federal standards may well be in line with those mandated by the World Health Organization (WHO) during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
"So basically – if the federal government does something corrupt, signs on with the WHO or whatever, those standards could potentially be implemented. That public health official may actually have the authority to force someone using any means necessary into treatment."
According to Renz, he guessed that the law would be at a blue state such as New York of California. However, the fact that it was Florida – a red state under Gov. Ron DeSantis – made it a scary development.
The Ohio-based lawyer and health freedom advocate pointed out that the governor was banking on his COVID-19 record, but questioned why he is propped up as a hero. While DeSantis signed supposedly "good" bills into laws, this questionable provision still remains. (Related: POLITICAL COURAGE: Ron DeSantis wants Florida Legislature to permanently ban COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates.)
Renz warned that this emergency law is terrifying for Floridians because they could be locked into their houses or forced into a quarantine camp. It also opens the possibility of the state's resident being forced to take an injection. "According to this law, any means 'any means necessary to treat the individual' without regard to your faith or anything else," Renz stressed.
He then questioned why DeSantis, who banks on his reputation as a defender of health freedom, has not done anything to strike down this unconstitutional statute.
"What is this? Should I believe that this is just a random? I don't know what this is," Renz remarked. "What I do know though is that this is a disaster – an absolute disaster. It's not OK in light of the fact that they are apparently working on new plandemics now."
Follow HealthFreedom.news for more news about public health emergency rules.