California state legislators oppose plan to release genetically modified MOSQUITOES to “control” wild mosquito population
11/08/2022 // Arsenio Toledo // Views

The state government of California drew flaks from environmentalists over a proposal to release genetically modified mosquitoes on the population.

British biotechnology company Oxitec plans to make California the second state in the union – after Florida – to host an experimental release of its genetically modified mosquitoes. It is planning to release millions of these modified mosquitoes in Tulare County in the San Joaquin Valley region. (Related: Biotech company to release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in California.)

News of this planned release of genetically modified mosquitoes comes as more reports pop up all over the state that the Aedes aegypti mosquito, a dangerous and invasive mosquito species, has been spotted in different parts of the state.

Aedes aegypti, colloquially called the yellow fever mosquito, is known for carrying diseases like Zika, dengue, chikungunya and yellow fever. It was first found in large numbers in Southern California around two decades ago, and since then has been slowly making its way up the state.

To solve this problem, Oxitec plans to introduce millions of modified yellow fever mosquitoes in 48 test sites in Tulare County, with potential expansion into Fresno, San Bernardino and Stanislaus. Oxitec claims that when these lab-built mosquitoes mate with their wild counterparts, their offspring die, leading to an eventual collapse of the population.

According to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR), which can approve or deny the test, between 5,000 and 30,000 genetically modified mosquitoes would be released on a weekly basis at each of the 48 sites and the permit would last until April 30, 2024.


At least eight state legislators – all Democrats – oppose the release of GMO mosquitoes

In a letter addressed to the DPR, Democratic state legislators – six from the State Assembly and two from the State Senate – demanded that the agency disapprove the first-ever release of genetically engineered (GE) mosquitos in the state.

They demand a comprehensive review of the potential impact this planned release has on public health and the environment.

"It is our understanding that while the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did approve the GE mosquitoes to be released in California, the agency did not conduct a thorough scientific review of the impacts of this insect on public health or the environment. California must require more and better information prior to any approval," wrote the legislators.

"We believe that the U.S. EPA review process was incomplete and that it is premature for the state of California to consider the Oxitec application without more diligent federal review," they continued. "There are many issues not addressed by U.S. EPA's review and there is insufficient data for the public to comment on the proposal or know its consequences."

Even if the EPA conducts a thorough review of the modified mosquitoes' impact, the legislators believe the application must also pass an analysis and a comprehensive review conducted under the standards set by the California Environmental Quality Act.

Following such a comprehensive review, the legislators believe the public should be presented with "environmentally preferable alternatives and mitigation measures" to control the population of Aedes aegypti and the public be allowed to decide if it prefers to let loose millions of genetically modified mosquitoes or other safer measures.

"The release of GE mosquitoes in California could be an experiment that, due to genetic spread, never ends and creates many unintended consequences. There are other more proven and less risky methods to control mosquitoes," wrote the legislators. "We urge DPR to address the concerns raised in this letter and to decline Oxitec's current Research Authorization application."

"Before we permit the use of GE mosquitoes, the DPR should provide for clear rules and a review of public health and environmental risks of releasing the insects in a public process," said State Assemblymember Laura Friedman, a Democrat who represents Glendale, Burbank and other parts of Los Angeles County. "There are too many unknown factors when it comes to how it could affect our biodiversity in the long run, including how this might influence populations of birds, bats, fish species and other insects."

Learn more about what is happening in California at

Watch this video strongly suggesting that the mosquitoes California wants to release will be used to vaccinate people against their will.

This video is from the High Hopes channel on

More related stories:

GMO mosquitoes now secretly VACCINATING people without their consent.

Bill Gates-funded Colombian mosquito factory breeds 30 million bacteria-infected mosquitoes weekly.

Genetically modified mosquitoes are being released in Florida Keys despite protests.

'Halt this nightmare': Alarm as Florida set to begin release of genetically engineered mosquitoes.

Bill Gates wants to deploy genetically modified mosquitoes to inject vaccines.

Sources include:

Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.