The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are all making decisions not based on science but on what the current regime is telling them to do.
"It's like a horror movie I'm being forced to watch and I can't close my eyes," one senior FDA official says. "People are getting bad advice and we can't say anything."
That official pointed to two recent developments at the FDA of major concern, one of them being the agency's authorization of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" for infants and toddlers, including those who already tested "positive" for covid.
A few months before this, the FDA did the same thing by authorizing so-called "booster" shots for young children, who have a zero percent chance of dying from COVID.
The NIH, which way up top is headed by Tony Fauci, is seeing a mass exodus of workers and extremely low morale. Many senior scientists have departed over the past year as COVID jab injuries and deaths continue to mount.
"They have no leadership right now," one NIH scientist is quoted as saying. "Suddenly there's an enormous number of jobs opening up at the highest level positions."
The CDC is facing the same situation with a large amount of turnover and low morale.
"Things have become so political, so what are we there for?" a CDC scientist said. "I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I'm embarrassed."
If America's public health agencies want to retain or gain back any credibility, they need to embrace real science
The reason why so many top-level scientists at these government agencies are quitting or avoiding telling others where they work these days is because of the blatant pseudoscience that they are being told to peddle.
Politics, not science, is what drives public health policy in the United States. And people are getting sick of it, especially those who have worked at these agencies for some time now and have seen their steady decline.
All three of these agencies supported the universal masking of children at school, as another example of the pseudoscientific garbage posing as "public health" these days.
"Compelling studies later found schools that masked children had no different rates of transmission," report Drs. Marty Makary, MD, MPH, and Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD, on their Common Sense news page.
"And for social and linguistic development, children need to see the faces of others."
The closure of schools is another bad policy that came out of these three agencies, a move that resulted in the poorest and most vulnerable children missing out on educational development.
"Poor and minority children suffered learning loss with an 11-point drop in math scores alone and a 20 percent drop in math pass rates," the doctors further write. "There are dozens of statistics of this kind."
Perhaps the biggest error in judgment was ignoring natural immunity in favor of the "vaccines." Some would argue that this was intentional, while others say it was just more politics catering to the vaccine industry – so, basically, it was intentional either way.
"CDC failed to balance the risks of COVID with other risks that come from closing schools," another CDC scientist lamented about the failed science at her agency.
"Learning loss, mental health exacerbations were obvious early on and those worsened as the guidance insisted on keeping schools virtual. CDC guidance worsened racial equity for generations to come. It failed this generation of children."
The latest news about Fauci Flu shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.
