"Positivity Rate by Vaccination Status" data covering the time period from April 23, 2022, to April 29, 2022, shows that the demographic with the least amount of "positive" test results for the Fauci Flu is the unvaccinated. The worst-off group, as you might expect, consists of people who received two main doses of the shot followed by a "booster" shot.
The Walgreens "COVID-19 Variant Tracker" claims that ever since January of this year, the predominant "strain" of Fauci Flu in circulation is omicron (moronic). Before that, it was delta that was supposedly in circulation.
How they know this is anyone's guess, seeing as how SARS-CoV-2 has never actually been isolated and proven to exist, let alone its many alleged "variants" and "subvariants."
People are testing "positive" for something fictitious, in other words, not to mention the fact that the PCR test is inherently fraudulent. It was never designed as a diagnosis tool, and is actually just an amplification tool that magnifies whatever it is pointed at, so to speak.
"PCR revolutionized molecular biology but its most notable application was in genetic fingerprinting, where its ability to magnify even the smallest traces of DNA became a major weapon in the fight against crime," revealed a paper put together by the Brownstone Institute.
"But, like a powerful magnifying glass or zoom lens, if it's powerful enough to find a needle in a haystack it's powerful enough to make mountains out of molehills."
Whatever is being magnified with these tests is most prominent among the "fully vaccinated," according to Walgreens. Only 14.1 percent of unvaccinated people are testing positive, while 19 percent of those who received one dose of a Fauci Flu injection are testing positive.
The positivity rate only goes up from there, with 24.3 percent of people who received two injections more than five months ago are testing positive. The figure is even higher at 27.8 percent among those who received three injections more than five months ago.
This data would suggest that the vials contain the disease, whatever that disease is. It is clear from the figures that getting jabbed increases one's risk of testing positive, so what are people actually getting injected with?
"Most actuaries know this," wrote someone in response to the news that the fully jabbed are seeing the worst health outcomes. "But math isn't 'science.'"
Another joked that the Walgreens data must first be run by government "doctor" Tony Fauci, who will decide for all of us whether or not it is true.
"Six months to the November election to flatten the stupidity," joked another.
Another asked if COVID "tests" are capable of sequencing the test samples. If not, then how is the variant type being determined, this person wants to know?
"Walgreens will probably face an investigation for releasing the data," said another.
Still another pointed out something that many seem to have forgotten: COVID injections were never touted as being able to prevent infection or spread. All the government claims they do is lessen the severity of an infection, though this remains an unproven hearsay that conflicts with the data.
"If people would have paid attention," this person added, "then they would also know that the stuff is not a 'vaccine' in the first place, "it's a selection of individually distinct experimental mRNA-based drugs, and nobody actually has a scientifically precise description of 'COVID' anyway."
The latest news about Fauci Flu shots can be found at Immunization.news.