log·ic | ?lä-jik
1: a proper or reasonable way of thinking about or understanding something
2: a particular way of thinking about something
3: the science that studies the formal processes used in thinking and reasoning
(Article by Alan Barton republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)
Although so-called scientists continually redefine the meaning of so many words to maintain their viewpoint in a specific subject, going back to the generally accepted definitions can yield some interesting thoughts, such as Isolation. The fact is that the so called SARS Cov2 “Covid19” virus has NEVER been isolated, and therefore can only be considered at best just a theory. The controversy surrounding whether or not it has ever been isolated comes down to the fact that the “virus” does not even exist, it is a fabricated myth.
There are an increasing number of medical research centers around the globe that are asking their respective health department headquarters for a sample of the virus so they can do their own research. And they are not just denied access to it, but are told that they do not even have it! How can researchers research something that does not exist? They say they would be happy to give it to them but THEY DO NOT HAVE IT. Not even one government health agency has a sample, and this is in the hundreds of documented requests denied since it does not even exist now or at any time, and not just a few places but all over the world. Not in China, not in the USA, not in Israel, not in Britain, not anywhere does a sample of the virus even exist. So as a result there is NO confirmation that the virus’ existence can be even found; and as a consequence it means that the SARS Covid virus has never been purified; has never been isolated; has never been proven to exist so the common sense conclusion –the LOGICAL conclusion – is that its composition, its very existence cannot be known. So the logical conclusion is that the structure, the composition of something known to not exist cannot be known. That is the conclusion derived from logic as further defined by M-W as “a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration : the science of the formal principles of reasoning” and “interrelation or sequence of facts or events when seen as inevitable or predictable”.
You cannot describe how something is put together if you cannot even prove that it exists, including the functions of any hypothetical protein. And the genetic sequence of something that has never been found cannot be known. And the variants of something that has never been proven to exist cannot be known, and therefore it is impossible to demonstrate that SARS Cov2 causes a disease called Covid 19.
The proper way to isolate, or to demonstrate a new virus is to first obtain samples from the blood, or phlegm, or some other bodily secretions from as large of a sampling of the population as possible who have the symptoms which are unique to that specific sample group as opposed to others that do not have those same symptoms, using symptoms unique enough to describe that particular illness, and without mixing any of those samples that were taken with any other kind of tissue or product that might have any kind of genetic material on them, then the virologist will macerate or chew it into incredibly small portions. Then filter it, ultracentrifuge it, purify the specimen and isolate the bacteriophages of identical sized and shaped particles using an electron scanning microscope, and those particles are the isolated, purified virus. (We have all seen the photos of those particles described as covid viruses) Then the genetic makeup derived by extracting genetic material from that particle and examining the chemical composition of that particle by using genetic sequencing techniques such as the Sanger sequence that has been around for decades and then do an analysis to confirm that all of those little particles that look exactly the same are exogenous (meaning outside of the cell), that their origin as a virus is outside the cell, not inside, as that confirms it is the virus and not some product of that cell, and in theory it can then go into the cell to change it. Because it is outside the cell, in the fluid that surrounds it all, it is not the product of a dead cell decomposing or breaking apart of that cell. There is NO virologist that has proven that it is anything other than the product of a dead or dying tissue and is therefore NOT A LIVING CELL that is expelling these particles.
So if you have come this far by isolating a fully isolated and sequenced information on an exogenous particle you still have to show that it causes the theorized disease. You cannot just proclaim “HERE IT IS!” you have to PROVE that it causes the disease. That is accomplished by taking those isolated particles and have proven that they come from the outside of the cell and not the inside (which has never been done) and then you expose a group of healthy test subjects to this isolated, purified virus in the manner that is thought to be transmitted. Then if the animal gets sick with the same disease that is confirmed by clinical autopsy findings then you can prove that that isolated particle has caused the disease which demonstrates infectiousness and transmission of an infectious agent.
Read more at: AllNewsPipeline.com