Between the years of 2013 and 2018, Alphabet Inc. contributed nearly $100,000 to Kamala as a California politician, $10,000 of which was to her political action committees (PACs). Other major contributors to Kamala include the WarnerMedia Group, the University of California, 21st Century Fox, and Venable LLP.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been shoveled over to Kamala by these corporate entities, several of which control various mainstream media outlets, in an apparent effort to eventually install her into the highest political office. And here we are in 2020 with Kamala on the same ticket as "Dementia Joe," who almost certainly will not serve a full term.
Since 2018, Kamala has been continually propped up by CNN, which just so happens to be owned by WarnerMedia, Kamala's top financial contributor. It is also important to note that Fox News, which has veered to the left in recent years, is owned by 21st Century Fox, Kamala's fourth highest contributor.
In 2019, it was suggested that Kamala would likely end up being the presidential nominee – which, disturbingly, could still happen if Biden is deemed unfit. It was also reported that Kamala has had "near-constant funding by the same big tech and media conglomerates she claims she will regulate."
Kamala Harris loves the war on drugs, would never legalize cannabis
Progressives everywhere would do well to take note of Kamala's horrific track record of pandering to special interests. Not only is she a threat to online free speech, but she is a police state hack who has spent much of her tenure in political office jailing people for petty crimes like cannabis possession.
"Harris' record also shows she is an advocate of the war on drugs and has opposed efforts to legalize marijuana," reports indicate. "As Attorney General, she suggested expansions of the state's efforts to track prescription drug users."
After the Supreme Court ruled that California's prisons were overcrowded to the degree that they were engaging in cruel and unusual punishment, in large part due to her prosecutorial zest, Kamala actually challenged this ruling and tried to keep as many prisoners locked up as possible.
Kamala even fought against the release of a man who was acquitted and found to be not guilty of a crime for which he was convicted. Daniel Larsen, who spent 13 years in prison for possession of a concealed knife, had simply failed to produce evidence of his innocence in a timely enough manner, a tragic situation for which heartless Kamala could not have cared less.
Perhaps the biggest point of contention, and the one that could cost Biden and Kamala the election, is Kamala's aggressive anti-gun record. She has almost no chance of winning Florida, and other swing states like Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania are also unlikely to support her long-held positions against the Second Amendment – that is, if these positions can even be reported without being dubbed as "racism" or "sexism."
"Given Kamala Harris's political record, it is far more likely that her presence will ultimately do more harm than good – which may very well be the difference in a potentially tight 2020 presidential election," reports The Burning Platform about the possibility of a Kamala presidency.
To keep up with the latest news about Kamala, be sure to check out KamalaHarris.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.
