Of pressing concern is the sudden push for mail-in voting in response to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). Many Democrats claim this is the only way to keep people "safe" from a "second wave," but is there more to it than that?
In recent days, Big Tech has also put its censorship agenda into overdrive, targeting not just the domains of Natural News and Brighteon but also President Trump's Twitter account.
This relentless attack on free speech is truly unprecedented. And when you couple it with both the pandemic and growing civil unrest, what we are witnessing is a recipe for absolute disaster this November.
Tech giants like Facebook and Twitter are doing their part to foment politically targeted hits against conservatives, all the while propping up Joe Biden – and by proxy his potential replacement, should he be deemed mentally unfit – as Trump's successor.
The whole thing smells of a setup, which is why Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, is calling for Americans to withdraw their consent from the 2020 election until every element of rigging can be rooted out of the process.
Even the president himself is calling for major justice against Silicon Valley, the political biases of which threaten to undo the very foundations of our constitutional republic.
"If Trump wanted to resolve this problem literally overnight, his best option is to seize the domain names of the tech giants and force them to respect the First Amendment or be shut down," Adams writes.
Be sure to listen below to The Health Ranger Report as Adams issues a public plea for free speech to be protected, no matter the cost:
What do you think should be done to fix the problem?
To those who would argue that the tech cabal is a cohort of private companies that can do whatever they want, the simple answer is that you are mistaken. Because they claim immunity protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), they legally have to behave in a way that protects online free speech.
Unfortunately, none of them are protecting free speech, which is why, at the very least, their Section 230 protections need to be immediately stripped. Should they continue to stifle free speech, then further action will be necessary in accordance with the law.
No matter where you fall on the political spectrum, it is a bipartisan fact that without the freedom to speak, there cannot exist free and fair elections. If only one side of the story is getting told, Americans cannot make an informed decision as to who they should vote for.
Beyond this, mail-in ballots leave an incredible amount of room for vote tampering and manipulation, which erodes the viability of the election even further. Something needs to change, or else we could lose our republic forever.
Our country is already splintered as it is, and any move towards remedying the problem will surely be met with resistance either on one side or the other. But do we really have a choice?
If we sit back and do nothing, the deep state will bring about the election outcome it desires through any means possible. On the other hand, if we stand together in solidarity against the abolishing of online free speech and those who would try to tamper with the election process, perhaps we can preserve our country for at least another four years.
To keep up with the latest news about online free speech, be sure to check out Censorship.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.
