According to reports, male coronavirus patients in Long Island, New York, are being given high doses of estrogen based on a "hunch" by some doctors that turning men into women could be the solution to this deadly pandemic.
Unbelievably, there are at least two clinical trials currently underway that involve dosing otherwise healthy men with female hormones, which some doctors claim could help to improve their immunity. Physicians in Los Angeles are also conducting similar experiments using progesterone, a prominent female hormone, which they contend could provide anti-inflammatory benefits.
"There's a striking difference between the number of men and women in the intensive care unit, and men are clearly doing worse," says Dr. Sara Ghandehari, a pulmonologist and intensive care physician at Cedars-Sinai who is heading up the West Coast progesterone study.
According to Ghandehari, 75 percent of her hospital's ICU patients on ventilators are men, so this must mean that being male makes a person more at risk of suffering from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), in her view.
On the other hand, women, including pregnant women who are immunocompromised, lean towards suffering milder bouts of coronavirus-induced disease. So this is more "proof" to Ghandehari that emasculating men by screwing up their hormones is the only way forward in fighting this pandemic.
"So something about being a woman is protective, and something about pregnancy is protective, and that makes us think about hormones," Ghandehari is further quoted as saying, presenting her opinions as "science."
That someone supposedly schooled in the healing arts would so quickly jump to targeting male hormones as some type of "cure" for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) just goes to show how deeply the anti-male agenda has embedded itself into society.
The system is no longer even pretending to seek sound scientific solutions to public health threats like this, instead turning every opportunity for honest investigation into a political agenda, in this case female empowerment.
The old adage that correlation does not equal causation immediately goes out the window anytime there is an opportunity to prop up women at the expense of men. After all, this entire arm of experimental coronavirus research hinges upon the notion that men are inherently "flawed" and have to have their natural male hormones replaced with female hormones in order to stay "healthy."
It is undeniable that men require healthy levels of testosterone and other male hormones in order to live their best lives. And to deprive men of male hormones massively increases their risk of death from a variety of causes.
But Ghandehari and her colleagues are apparently more concerned with seizing this opportunity to target men while claiming that their motives are to advance "science." Just who do they think that they are fooling?
Another woman, Dr. Sharon Nachman from the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University on Long Island, is pulling a similar fast one on men living on the East Coast, as she, too, is convinced that being male is the problem when it comes to catching the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
"It's totally out of the box," Nachman is quoted as stating proudly, adding that this "is how good ideas often start."
To keep up with the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include: