White House says gun control will deter terrorists ... the same way government spending reduces debt

Wednesday, December 09, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: gun laws, Obama, civil liberties

---

(NaturalNews) Don't worry, folks: the government is here to save you from all those nasty terrorists just looking for the next opportunity to traumatize you and your family – because they're jealous of your "freedom," of course. The only stipulation is that you must first agree to hand over your firearms to U.S. government officials, as this is the only way to stop ISIS, Al-Qaeda, or whatever terrorist flavor of the week Big Brother says is anxiously trying to shoot up your school, sports stadium, or local place of worship.

This was the predictable message issued by the White House following the latest gun control-motivated terrorist spectacle in San Bernardino, California, where a Muslim couple and friend allegedly got into an argument with coworkers at a work party and decided to rush home, gear up in riot suits stocked with homemade explosives and assault weaponry, and quickly return to shoot people and blow the place up – you know, because most middle-aged couples have military-grade weapons just sitting around in the event that conversations around the water cooler get a little bit too heated.

Anyway, what we're all supposed to accept as fact, according to the Obama administration, is that law-abiding citizens having access to guns is somehow responsible for such bizarre narratives, which an increasing number of people are starting to recognize as false flag terrorism being conducted by the U.S. government, not Muslims. Even so, Obama and Co. is hoping that the dumbest of the dumb will take the gun control bait and hand over their Second Amendment rights in exchange for a false sense of security.

"The president believes that passing common sense gun laws that makes it harder for people with bad intentions to get guns, makes the country safer," stated White House press secretary Josh Earnest during a recent interview with Peter Doocy of The Weekly Standard.

Recognizing that terrorists – if they even exist in the way they're portrayed by the corporate media, which is questionable at best – aren't going to follow gun laws because they're criminals by definition, Doocy asked Earnest to explain the rationale behind Obama's treasonous call to shred the Bill of Rights using the excuse of improved national security. He responded with gushing political correctness:

"We're still learning of the precise motives of the individuals who carried out this heinous act of violence yesterday. One thing we do know, is the four fire arms they were wielding were legally purchased under the laws in place now. ... So, that might lead some to conclude that we should have made it a little harder for them."

Governments have murdered far more people than terrorists; maybe we should eliminate ours in the interests of public safety

Following this same flawed logic, the government should also make it harder for people to access, well, itself, because in the 20th century alone, governments around the world slaughtered roughly 260 million of their own people – people who, ironically, weren't armed because their murderous government had already stolen their guns.

Nevertheless, Team Obama is hoping the average American won't bother with all that history stuff, and just accept the official story that guns are bad, and that people need to give them up in order to stop government-sponsored – a.k.a. "random" – acts of terrorism from occurring. And you can be sure that if the usurper and his minions don't get their wish, there will be more "shootings" in the coming weeks and months to achieve this end.

Sources for this article include:

WeeklyStandard.com

NodisInfo.com

NodisInfo.com

WinterActionables.com