(NaturalNews) Mainstream media talking heads and potential presidential candidates have taken to the spotlight and have delivered their own thoughts on pharmaceutical vaccines.

The President of the United States, Barack Obama, has most recently stated, "The science is, you know, pretty indisputable. We've looked at this again and again. There is every reason to get vaccinated."

The President is calling on the population to blindly accept all vaccines pushed by pharmaceutical companies without researching the various viral and bacterial infections these vaccines are designed to prevent. When a leader says, "just get vaccinated and accept the science as settled," they are preventing the science from improving altogether. Instead, we should encourage vaccine manufacturers to use safer ingredients and carry out real, honest research. GlaxoSmithKline still uses mercury in their flu vaccine FluLaval, yet we are told to just accept this toxin as it is.

For those parents who understand what measles really is, they can choose not to vaccinate with this live virus because they understand that getting measles naturally isn't deadly. After facing measles naturally, one gains lifelong immunity and exercises their immune system to handle more dangerous viruses in the future.

Groupthink vaccine propaganda being broadcast throughout the mainstream media

First, there's potential presidential candidate Chris Christie advocating for vaccination and telling parents that they should have some choice in the matter, but that choice is ultimately up to the government to designate. "But I also understand that parents need to have some measure of choice in things as well, so that's the balance that the government has to decide," Christie said. [emphasis added]

Then there's retired pediatric neurosurgeon Ben Carson who believes that vaccines only work in a person's body if everyone nearby is vaccinated too. He laughably believes that a person free of disease who chooses to build immunity without vaccines can affect those nearby in negative, profound ways. "This is a situation where we're dealing with public health and public safety and we're all in the same boat. And that's a very different type of situation than one where your personal choice affects only you," he claimed.

Even Rand Paul contradicted himself. "I've heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines," he stated. Then in contrast he went on to say, "I'm not arguing vaccines are a bad idea. I think they're a good thing...."

At least he did say, "I think the parent should have some input. The state doesn't own your children. Parents own the children and it is an issue of freedom," but in the end, Rand Paul tweeted a photo of himself unnecessarily subjecting himself to a booster shot so as to not appear as an "anti-vaxxer" in the public's eye.

Hillary Clinton's stance most resembles a cult leader. She compares vaccine ingredient safety to the certainty that the sky is blue. Her disingenuous advice now: "the science is clear: the earth is round, the sky is blue and vaccines work. Let's protect our kids."

Do your own research and find better ways to build immunity

Instead of just accepting vaccines as irrefutable science, we should be looking at ways to improve them across the board. There also needs to be better education on the diseases which these vaccinations are for. Really, how necessary is a measles shot, a rotavirus shot or a flu virus shot for children and adults? In what ways can we help women breastfeed to provide nature's optimal immunity to infants? Is there any logic in protecting infants from tetanus with a vaccine at all? How about injecting newborns with a liver disease that is typically transmitted sexually?

There are many reason to not vaccinate, to forestall vaccination or to face disease naturally. There's many reasons why someone would not want to subject themselves or their child to toxic mercury, aluminum, or viruses grown in monkey kidney cells, bovine serum or aborted fetal cells. How does the body react to these foreign substances, especially when they are injected through an abnormal route, directly into the blood?

If we don't ask questions and deviate from the vaccine groupthink propaganda, we will ultimately be left at the mercy of neurological disease, autoimmune diseases, learning and behavioral problems, cognitive decline, seizures, sudden infant death, encephalopathy and countless other severe problems caused by "irrefutable vaccine science."

Cult leader who convinced hundred to castrate themselves mirrors Americans' blind obedience to vaccines

Blind obedience to vaccination is similar to the hundreds of people who followed cult leader Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. The Indian pop star and telepreacher, who is worth more than $50 million, convinced around 400 men to surgically remove their testicles to get closer to God. Pharmaceutical companies, valued in the billions of dollars, use similar promises, telling people that they are protecting themselves from disease when they destroy their nervous system with neurotoxic chemicals.

As the allegations mounted, Singh was quoted as saying, "Such allegations disturb me, when I am doing good for humanity." It's the same words pharmaceutical companies and mandating officials say. They're doing it for the good of humanity.

The biggest problem might not be the vaccines themselves. It might be the blind obedience to the growing number of vaccines without any type of education on their ingredients or the diseases they purportedly prevent.

Sources for this article include

http://www.independent.co.uk

http://www.npr.org