Ebola quarantine nurse's ties to CDC scrubbed from web; was it a staged op to invoke opposition to quarantines?

Sunday, October 26, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: Ebola quarantines, New Jersey, CDC

---

(NaturalNews) Kaci Hickox, the nurse who was quarantined in New Jersey over her high risk status as a possible Ebola carrier, has ties to the CDC which have been deliberately hidden by the mainstream media.

Right now, a war is waging between states like New Jersey, New York and Illinois -- which have all decided to quarantine travelers at high risk of Ebola infections -- and the federal government which is adamantly opposed to border security, medical quarantines and travel bans.

Kaci Hickox emerged in the center of this debate just yesterday when she complained of being "interrogated" and held in violation of her civil rights. Kaci's LinkedIn.com profile, which described her links to the CDC, was scrubbed from the web earlier today, and even Google cache has strangely been cleared of her profile which previously detailed her ties to the CDC.

The now-famous DallasNews.com article [1] which published Hickox's complaints failed to mention the nurse's ties to the CDC.

It turns out that Kaci Hickox is a registered democrat and Obama supporter who works for the CDC. "The nurse currently quarantined in New Jersey is an employee for the Centers for Disease Control and a registered Democrat with a history of left-wing advocacy," reports GotNews.com [2]

The LinkedIn.com page that has since been scrubbed is:
www.linkedin.com/pub/kaci-hickox/30/793/7b8

Was Nurse Hickox's quarantine staged as a P.R. stunt to invoke opposition to state quarantines?

The timing of Hickox's quarantine, her ties with the party in power at the White House, the deliberate hiding of her ties to the CDC and the scrubbing of her LinkedIn.com profile all raise legitimate suspicion that her quarantine complaints have all been staged as a P.R. stunt to promote opposition to state-level Ebola quarantine efforts.

President Obama is already pressuring the Governors of NJ, NY and IL to reverse their quarantine protocols. "The Obama administration has expressed deep concerns to the governors of New York and New Jersey and is consulting with them to modify their orders to quarantine medical volunteers returning from West Africa," reports the NY Times. [3]

Placing a very vocal nurse in quarantine and encouraging her to complain about civil rights violations -- all while arranging a mass media carpet bombing of the public with those complaints -- seems far too convenient to be a coincidence. From the very start, almost every single story the public has been allowed to see on Ebola has been contrived, engineered or distorted for either political or profiteering purposes. It is difficult to believe that this quarantine outrage just happened to coincide with President Obama's attempts to have the quarantines closed down.

For an example of the kind of obfuscation and fact-burying efforts being pursued by some factions of the government, watch this exasperating video where Rep. Massie tries to get a straight answer about Ebola transmission via contaminated surfaces. [5]

Why is the White House trying to dismantle state-level Ebola quarantines?

All this brings up the obvious question: Why is President Obama working so hard to dismantle state-level quarantine efforts?

The mandatory quarantines announced by New Jersey and New York are the first sensible thing any government has yet done to prevent the spread of Ebola in America. Pressuring state Governors to reverse these medical isolation protocols seems to be a deliberate effort to encourage the worsening of the pandemic. (The only reason Nigeria escaped the Ebola pandemic is because the country closed its borders and invoked mandatory quarantines.)

Do the White House and the CDC actively want to see Ebola infections spread out of control? While the question may seem outlandish at first, it is increasingly difficult to explain away these bizarre actions being taken by the federal government: allowing infected travelers easy entry into the United States, recommending wholly inadequate medical gear to health care workers, keeping the southern border completely unprotected and now trying to dismantle state-level quarantines that would prevent infected people from spreading Ebola to the population at large. Didn't the example of Dr. Spencer running around New York City while he had Ebola awaken anybody enough at the federal level to call for quarantines and border security?

Mostly what we keep hearing from the federal government is pure fabrication or distortion. For example, check out these ten glaring Ebola contradictions the federal government continues to push, hoping the U.S. public is too uninformed to call their bluff.

Different factions jockeying for profits or power

The CDC, for the record, is clearly a pro-vaccine institution that has already been caught hyping up swine flu in order to create billions of dollars in vaccine profits for drug companies. Top CDC employees also routinely take jobs with pharmaceutical manufacturers. There is no better way to generate market demand for high-profit Ebola vaccines than to allow a few dozen infections to terrorize the public in selected U.S. cities. Fear has always been used by the vaccine industry to scare the public into buying their faulty products. [4]

But how does all this fit into White House plans? There are plenty of theories being seriously debated right now across the 'net, ranging from Obama's desire to declare medical martial law to global depopulation agendas. Jon Rappoport at NoMoreFakeNews.com is even arguing that the entire Ebola pandemic is a massive global hoax.

I can't say which theory makes the most sense at this point, but my best guess is that we are witnessing all sorts of government and corporate factions fighting with each other over how to exploit this Ebola situation for their maximum gain. Drug companies simply want to see as much fear as possible so they can sell vaccines as soon as they are granted global legal immunity (which is already in the works). Obama wants to keep the southern border open so that more amnesty candidates keep flooding in to vote for socialist candidates. The CDC wants to gain a huge increase in its operating budgets (which also translates into salaries and bonuses) by being tasked with tackling a massive global crisis. One way or another, every sector of government and corporate enterprise is looking for a way to profit from this crisis.

That's why I don't expect a resolution any time soon. There's too much money and power at stake now to stop Ebola. The pandemic is proving to be a very effective way to gain the obedience of the public, and the worse the pandemic gets, the more desperately the American public will be begging for government to save them. To make this happen, Ebola quarantines must be immediately halted for the simple reason that they interfere with the spread of the virus that's necessary to invoke a critical mass of panic across the population.

Think about it: If the White House were really interested in "an abundance of caution" as we're always told, then why wouldn't 21-day quarantines for high-risk travelers make amazing sense? Somehow, when it comes to possibly-infected travelers arriving from West Africa, that "abundance of caution" is thrown out the window.

But don't worry. It's only a level-4 biohazard virus with extremely rapid adaptability, a history of going airborne, and a 70% fatality rate with no known treatment or cure. What could possibly go wrong?

Sources for this article include:
[1] http://www.dallasnews.com/ebola/headlines/20...

[2] http://gotnews.com/ebola-nurse-complaining-q...

[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/27/nyregion/e...

[4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFQQOv-Oi6U

[5] http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?...

[6] https://www.naturalnews.com/047317_ebola_rest...