Wednesday, February 01, 2006 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...) Tags: personal care products, business ethics, health products |
Bronner: Or lack thereof.
Mike: Or lack thereof. Can you tell the readers what this is all about?
Bronner: Basically in the food world, a company that is making organic products, or putting organic into the brand name -- for instance, Maggie's Organics or Albert's Organics, which is the largest organic produce distributor in the U.S. -- actually makes, produces and sells organic products. In personal care, companies think there is a loophole, such that they can put "organic" or "organics" into the brand name even if it's not an entirely organic product. So instead of doing the hard work of working with the manufacturers to build the real ingredients from organic material and certified organic farms, they just have just the same old formulations as always, add a little organic water and extract of this or that and then slap "organics" into the brand name.
Mike: So some of these products are 90 percent or even 95 percent of the same old process -- chemical ingredients with a little bit of organic water -- and then they call it organic shampoo or organic soap.
Bronner: Yes. The word "nature" or "organic" appears huge on the label. With a truly organic personal hair product, there's no distinction on the label to a consumer. The consumer doesn't know. It's just ruining the organic labeling program for personal care.
Mike: So what you are hoping to see, then, is an organic labeling law or regulation in the personal care products industry that's similar to the food industry?
Bronner: Exactly. Superficially, everyone says that's what they want, but in practice they're saying, "Here, we'll just do this branding. We don't really care what the ultimate personal care standard works out to be. We're just going to work around it and brand 'organic' on the products we're going to make."
Mike: If it deceives the consumer, the consumer buys it and the manufacturer profits.
Bronner: Exactly. They keep their costs down and don't pay any organic premiums.
Mike: I'm reminded of some of the shampoos that you can find at Wal-Mart, like Herbal Essences Shampoo. You look at it, and where are the herbs?
Bronner: Exactly, and it's almost worse (than) what's happening in the natural channel because at least at Wal-Mart, the consumer doesn't necessarily care whether there are herbs. But at health food stores, consumers are motivated to support organics. They want organics. It's that much worse, then, to see this deceit, deception or fraud going on. A lot of people complain about the Clairol "Organic and Orgasm" ad, and yes, that's not great. However, the ad is more about selling sex than organics to a particular demographic or mass market, whereas in the natural world, when a company like Jason puts "pure natural organic" on the label, people believe it. People trust that organic program, and these personal care companies are ripping off the integrity and rigor of the program, and ultimately they're going to compromise it and create lack of trust in the whole program for food as well as body care.
Mike: What are some of the ingredients that consumers should watch out for on the labels of these shampoos or soaps that kind of give away that they are not organic products?
Bronner: Well, definitely if you see anything that ends in "eth." The suffix "eth" means fatty alcohol is being ethoxylated with ethylene oxide, and that produces 1,4 dioxane as a trace contaminate. There's no way that belongs in a natural product, let alone an organic product.
Mike: So you should watch out for any chemical word that ends with "eth." Some companies like to list some ingredients and say they are from corn or something.
Bronner: Yes, and sometimes they're right. I mean there are better or worse surfactants. Some do come from corn sugar and coconut fatty acids, but these marketing editors don't know what's what; they don't care. They'll say it's all from corn, you know?
Mike: So to switch gears, Dr. Bonner's Soap Company has remained in the family. It has not sold out to the big business in this country that I'm sure has made offers for your company.
Bronner: Sure.
Mike: So why is that? What keeps the passion going in your company and in your family to keep this as a wholesome product?
Bronner: We're more of a charitable engine, almost a social progressive engine, than a business. Our big project right now is sustainability in personal care. This is our industry, and it's important because this is the first industry outside of food that's going to go organic. It needs to go organic in a way that sets a precedent for other industries. This is the precedent we need to set in this industry, but generally, you watch what happens at Body Shop or any of the progressive businesses that sell out, and they just lose social mission. That's what we care about. We're kind of a nonprofit. We don't need to go out and hassle people to give us money. We sell a really cool product; it's part of our mission.
Mike: It's a fantastic sustainable business model for social change. I haven't seen any really serious competition to your product from Proctor and Gamble, say, or the big makers. All their products, even if they tried to do something like yours, are so polluted with ingredients that natural people don't want that. It doesn't even compete.
Bronner: Right, that's the thing. Generally, they are so obsessed with detergents and this and that, that they won't use a pure Castile soap, partly because the cost of materials is quite high to make a really good Castile soap. For them, it's the cost of goods; it just doesn't work in their business model. In a way, they can't really offer it.
Mike: Because they're getting so much to go through the channel and so much to market.
Bronner: We're in a fortunate position. We put in 2 percent peppermint oil. No one spends that kind of money for that level of peppermint oil and 40 percent soap. Most soaps are around 15 percent concentrated. [Our soup] is very rare and they haven't produced anything that even comes close to it.
Mike: The only thing I've seen is a product at Trader Joe's.
Bronner: Yes, and that is some tallow oil; it's some inferior kind of cheap oil that they're using.
Mike: I just noticed it recently, in fact. I hadn't seen it before now.
Bronner: See, it may come to us private label, and we just don't private label.
Mike: I see.
Bronner: We use our own brand formula. It's our unique label, and we don't want it on other labels.
Mike: Well, thank you for taking time to talk with me, David.
Bronner: You're welcome!
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.
Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest
"Big Tech and mainstream media are constantly trying to silence the independent voices that dare to bring you the truth about toxic food ingredients, dangerous medications and the failed, fraudulent science of the profit-driven medical establishment.
Email is one of the best ways to make sure you stay informed, without the censorship of the tech giants (Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.). Stay informed and you'll even likely learn information that may help save your own life."
–The Health Ranger, Mike Adams