Originally published January 3 2005
Can-Spam anti-spam law remains useless after first year on the books
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Just as I predicted over a year ago, Can-Spam has done absolutely nothing to curtail spam. Today, spam is worse than ever. What's needed is either a technical solution (the Puzzle Solution) or widespread certification of email practices. That's why I created Relemail, an email sender certification service that eliminates the possibility of spam before the emails are ever sent. It also keeps mailers honest through independent auditing of their behaviors, not just their privacy policies. Learn more at Relemail.com.
Relemail can play an important role in restoring credibility to the medium of email. Can-Spam, in contrast, has really only legalized spamming. You see, Can-Spam doesn't outlaw spam at all: it technically makes it 100% legal! As I've said all along, this isn't a problem that can be solved by legislation alone. It's going to take technical solutions combined with certification processes like Relemail to really make a lasting difference.
-
The nation's first law aimed at curtailing junk e-mail earned a mixed report card after a year on the books as few spammers faced legal action and recent surveys showed that spam makes up an even larger proportion of online messages.
- Signed into law Dec. 16, 2003, the Can-Spam Act made it illegal to falsify the "from" and "subject" lines of e-mail solicitations.
- The law doesn't allow individual e-mail users to sue spammers -- an omission decried by anti-spam activists -- but it did open the door for state attorneys general and ISPs to mount a legal offensive.
- The nation's big four e-mail providers -- America Online, Microsoft, Yahoo and Earthlink -- were among the most ardent supporters of the law, and wasted no time using the new provisions.
- On the criminal front, a Virginia jury in November recommended a nine year jail term for a North Carolina man who became the first ever person convicted for felony spamming.
- Still, through all the courtroom activity and the media attention it generated, spam levels rose in 2004, by almost all accounts.
- At the beginning of 2003, spam accounted for about 50 percent of all e-mail, according to Postini, a Redwood City, Calif.-based anti-spam firm that scans about 400 million e-mail messages a day for its clients.
- "They clearly don't think they'll be caught."
- But Michael Osterman, president of Osterman Research Inc., a Black Diamond, Wash.-based research firm that specializes in the e-mail and instant-messaging industry, said the failure really isn't the fault of lawmakers.
- The underlying technology of e-mail makes it extremely easy for spammers to hide their identities by using dozens of tricks, including sending messages from the computers of innocent Internet users who've had their computers compromised by viruses.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml